08.06.08

Review: Fat Loss Troubleshoot

Posted in Nutrition tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , at 4:07 pm by leslie

Ever wonder why you “hardly eat” but can’t lose weight? Why you work out like a maniac but don’t lose weight? Why you follow Program X but see no results?

What secret forces are conspiring to prevent your weight loss? (Genes? Hormones? Aliens?)

The answers to those questions and more are in Leigh Peele’s e-book Fat Loss Troubleshoot. Leigh’s main goal is to get you in, get the weight (fat) off, and get you on with your life; dieting should not be a way of life but rather a brief phase. She looks at common misconceptions and “advice” and shows you why that isn’t right and what, instead, is. She also includes case studies from her clients that shows how she was able to find and fix what they were doing incorrectly.

A lot of the advice, you might be tempted to think, “Oh, I knew that already.” Oh, really? Then why aren’t you losing the fat? Sure, you might know a lot of this, but you haven’t quite put it all together. Leigh lays it all out; you get no more excuses by the time you finish reading.

The section that really hit me was on training & eating for your goals and getting enough recovery. If your goal is strength, you need to eat for strength and rest & sleep for strength. But if your goal is fat loss, you need to eat for fat loss (that is, in a deficit) and train for fat loss (that is, not so intense that you can’t function) and make sure your body is recovering. So sure, do the fat loss thing — and just the fat loss thing — until you’re at your goal, and then change goals.

FLTS is mostly a breakdown of the how’s and why’s and why not’s of fat loss. It includes calorie calculations for maintenance and deficits and an activity quiz to determine how much you’re really moving. In addition to FLTS, though, Leigh also offers “OPT for Fat Loss,” which is a workout and calorie deficit program based on everything you learn in FLTS so you don’t have to do it all yourself, and the “Metabolic Repair Manual.”

MRM is for people who have dieted for years and who may have created a slow metabolic response and/or other intestinal problems. (There’s a quiz in the manual to see if you qualify.) MRM takes you through a process of resting and slowly eating more until your metabolic response and digestion is normal. A plan that makes you eat more? Sounds crazy and like a recipe for massive weight gain, right? Except Leigh’s plan works and with little to no weight gain, and sometimes even weight loss! (See this thread in the JP Fitness Forums for one lady’s experience with MRM.) I’m only a Level 1 (little to no damage) mostly because I haven’t been able to stick to any “diet” for more than two weeks. =P

And, as if she hasn’t written enough yet, Leigh answers questions in the Fat Loss Troubleshoot forum at JP Fitness, and her blog has more info, articles, and comments. Subscribe to her podcast; sign up for the Subscribers’ section. Also, watch her Fat Loss Tips video. (Btw, the answer to the question “What secret forces are conspiring to prevent your weight loss?” is found in that video.)

* * * * *

I really started following Leigh’s advice at the end of June (July 4th holiday not included!). With BJJ/MMA only 3 days/week and injured toes, I had the time to pay attention. And it made a huge difference. In the last month, my clothes have started to fall off as I’ve lost weight. I have progress pictures taken back in May and some taken last weekend, and the difference is amazing. In the last month I’ve started to get “You’ve lost a lot of weight!” comments. (And one hilarious addendum: “Did you do it on purpose?” Erm, yes.)

* * * * *

Update 08/15/08: Skwigg has reviewed both FLTS and MRM. (As for the grammar issues, yes, they’re there (and I had to hide all my red pens), but Leigh explained that she hired an editor who did a bad job. She’s the Fat Loss Troubleshooter, not the Grammar Queen, after all.)

04.22.08

Post-Workout Nutrition

Posted in Nutrition, Supplements tagged , , , , , , at 10:06 am by leslie

Post-workout, your muscles need glucose and protein. (No fat.) Glucose to replace the glucose/glycogen that you just used up, and protein (amino acids) as building blocks for new muscle proteins.

Glucose is the direct molecule that your cells use to get energy. Fructose, found mostly in fruit, has to be converted to glucose by your liver. Maltodextrin is a starch of glucose molecules, usually made from corn or wheat.

Either glucose/fructose or maltodextrin or a combination of the two is fine. Some people are adamant about one or the other; most said simply “carbohydrate.” The main point is to get some kind of a faster-absorbing carb in your post-workout nutrition so that your muscle and liver glycogen can be restored (and won’t steal amino acids from your muscle proteins to reverse-engineer glucose).

My PWO shake:

  • 2 scoops Blue Ice Iso-Extreme (30 g protein)
  • 0.5 scoop Xtinguisher (25 g dextrose (carb))
  • 8 oz Fruit Punch Gatorade (14 g carbs (fructose & sucrose))
  • 1 scoop Max Glutamine (5 g)

An hour or so after your post-workout shake, have a regular meal of protein, carbs, and fat.

03.31.08

Women and Exercise

Posted in Nutrition, Workouts tagged , , , , , , at 10:12 am by leslie

tapemeasure_heavyweightgeek.jpg
Photo by heavyweightgeek

I’ve noticed that women usually hear the word “exercise” or “workout” and immediately jump to “losing weight.” We’ve been convinced that exercise is only good for changing the number on the scale.

Eat less, exercise more. It’s the mantra we’ve been taught. I’m too fat. It’s what we tell ourselves every day. So when we see a program like New Rules of Lifting for Women, we jump on board and expect weight loss to follow quickly.

And then… Weeks pass, and we look the same. The scale has gone up instead of down. We compare our “before” and “current” pictures, and we look the same. Even when other people tell us that there’s more definition in our abs/legs/face or that our butt looks higher, we don’t believe them. “Those pants” still don’t fit–or are even tighter!

I’m exercising, we think. Why am I not losing weight? We worry that the program isn’t working, that it’s another gimmick and we’ve been had. Sure, we can lift heavier weights than we thought; we’re sore in muscles we didn’t know we had; we have more energy than ever before. But still we long for hours of cardio and high reps with pink dumbbells; at least the scale moved in the “right” direction back then.

This isn’t just a physical transformation we’re going through. It’s a mental and a physiological one, as well. We must retrain our minds to focus on the goal and not current obstacles; we must learn patience and trust. We must learn that the standards we’re using to judge our progress may not be accurate. We must teach our bodies to adjust to the new demands on them; we must fuel our bodies for the activities we put them through. This is a metamorphosis.

What are we becoming?

03.26.08

What are you eating?

Posted in Nutrition tagged , , , at 9:00 am by leslie

popcorn_ppdigital.jpg
Photo by PPDIGITAL

There’s a new show on TLC called I Can Make You Thin. The host, Paul McKenna, is a motivational & lifestyle coach (near as I can tell) who gives you a few changes to make at a time that keep you from overeating. (Here’s a funny: the banner on the TLC page says “This show is for entertainment purposes only.”)

I only caught bits of the program over the weekend, but one social experiment they did caught my attention. They wanted to test the effect of distraction (e.g., watching television) on eating. So they left out some popcorn until it got stale and then took it out on the street for people to taste-test; everyone said it was disgusting and stale. Then they took that same popcorn into a movie theater and gave it away as theater popcorn. (Didn’t say whether people paid for it.) At the end of the movie, they asked patrons about the popcorn. Most had eaten almost all of the stale popcorn and said it was fine!

So those people ate stale popcorn during a movie and didn’t notice that it tasted bad. What else might you be missing if you eat while trying to do something else?

03.07.08

Start: Week 2

Posted in Nutrition tagged , , , at 9:00 am by leslie

  1. Slowly replace soft drinks and fruit juice with water.
  2. Continue writing down your food. Add: weigh out and measure your food, and write this down, too. (Again, no limits on what it is, so write it all down.)
  3. Continue spreading food over 5-6 meals.

03.01.08

Start: Week 1

Posted in Nutrition tagged , , at 9:00 am by leslie

  1. Drink more water.
  2. Spread your current meals over 5-6 meals.
  3. Write down what you eat. (I don’t care what it is yet; just write it down.)

01.15.08

New Rules of Lifting for Women

Posted in Workouts tagged , , , , , , , , , , at 9:00 am by leslie

The New Rules of Lifting for Women: Lift Like A Man, Look Like A Goddess, Lou Schuler, Cassandra Forsythe, and Alwyn Cosgrove (2007).

I’d seen this book mentioned on one of my SparkPeople groups, so I picked it up. The author, a former editor at Men’s Health magazine, quickly admits that he is a non-woman. The book is simply laugh-out-loud funny in some places.

The basic principle of the book is simple: women need to lift heavier weights to get the results they want. *insert much applause* If you’re a female who’s scared of the big weights or if you want validation that lifting heavy is good, then you’ll probably enjoy most of this book. This book is meant to push you off the treadmill and in to the land of iron and steel.

The other strong points in the book are:

  • Ditch the “Barbie” weights. (I am so stealing that phrase.)
  • Eat more calories. Most women eat too few.
  • Eat more protein (at least 1 g/lb of body weight).
  • Eat 5-6 smaller meals/day.
  • Focus on losing fat, not just “weight”.
  • Traditional cardio isn’t the only way to lose fat.
  • Training “abs” (or, in modern gym-speak, “the core”) is usually goofy and counter-productive.

While this book is written by an author who also wrote the same book targeted to men, this is not simply the men’s book with feminine pronouns. The first part, especially, goes after all the excuses and myths women have heard. This book really is about women and lifting.

The first part of the book is rather long but goes in to detail to explain why women can and should lift like a man (one reason: because our muscles work the same way); it strikes down the “sculpt and tone” idiocy and other “facts” that are incorrect. This part also emphasizes that you must eat enough calories and why. Instead of losing “weight,” the focus is on losing body fat, so the discussion of measuring your progress is presented in terms of how do your clothes fit, how do you feel, how do you look, etc., instead of what the scale says.

The second part of the book shows sample meals for the 5-6 meals. A lot of the recipes added whey protein powder for extra protein. I admit that I skimmed through this second part rather quickly, but I did notice that they list an iced coffee protein shake, which is my current post-workout shake. Whoot! Also, there are small lists of decent frozen and fast food and most of the recipes look fairly easy & non-time-consuming to prepare.

The third part of the book gives the exercise plan: Workout A and Workout B, which you alternate over 3 days/week. (Just like my current lifting plan.) Squats & squat variations figure in prominently (good), and the emphasis is on whole-body movements rather than isolating muscles (also good) and on using free weights over machines. Also, the plan actually changes every few weeks to prevent your body from becoming too efficient at the exercises (also good–and reminds me, my program needs a shake-up). There are pictures to illustrate most exercises, too (I did laugh at one as I seriously see myself doing a face plant if I tried the Plank with Swiss Ball and Bench exercise:P). And, according to the author, this workout plan is harder than the one is the men’s book. Take that!

All in all, I’d recommend this book to any female who wants to look like the fitness & figure competitors–proportioned and strong.

My one complaint is that they do advocate partial squats (“curtsies,” Krista at Stumptuous calls them) but give no reason why these are supposedly better than full squats. I find that full squats put far less pressure on my knees than trying to hang halfway down, and most information I’ve read elsewhere also recommends using a full range of motion on squats.

The partial vs. full squats was also brought up in the forum. Yes, there is a forum for the book, and at least two of the authors do actually comment on the questions. Very nice addition to the book.

Especially recommended as motivation to go hit the weights =P

***
Update 1/29/08: I’ve been doing NROLFW for a week now, and I love it. You can see my daily notes through my NROLFW tag.